Texas V. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)

PA205: Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing, Unit One, Assignment 1) The outcome orbit references section 42.09 (a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code. The ordinance prohibits the desecration of a grand object. 2) Legislative 3) The passage discusses the court case that refer evince V. Johnson (Gregory Lee Johnson) 4) The three courts that heard this case: 1) Texas appeal of whitlow Appeals (most authority) 2) Texas Court of Appeals 3) D bothas County Criminal Court (least authority) 5) Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) 6) The Texas statute was potty heap since the controlling Court govern it was inordered with the First Amendment. 7) statutory truth are law passed by sending a bill by passing it through a legislative body. Statutes are created when cowcatcher court cases are heard and command upon. Case law is created by rulings that are a firmness of purpose of examining statutes. Case law flowerpot either uphold the accredited statute or strike it bug out. Case law turns proscribed to be an commentary, or a second brass at statutes, determining whether or not they uphold the U.S. Constitution.

It seems to me that statutes evict be either struck down after interpretation or continue to be enforced. If someone challenges the statute, it could travel all the modal value to the Supreme Court to be interpreted. The Supreme Court stern provide a decision whether that statute is being utilise in a constitutional manner. In the passage we read, the secern tried Johnson with a statute that ultimately was struck down because it was inconsistent with the translation of the First Amendment. S o, statutes can be amend or changed if not a! cceptable. If they are put together to be consistent with the U.S. Constitution, they can stay in affect.If you destiny to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.